Abordaje del acceso vascular por equipo de terapia infusional: seguridad y calidad asistencial / Approach to vascular access by infusion therapy team: safety and quality of care

Objetivo: describir la evolución del modelo de atención del acceso vascular por un equipo de terapia infusional enfermero referente (ETI) y sus resultados en la seguridad vinculados al acceso vascular central de inserción periférica (PICC) en pacientes oncohematológicos. Métodos: estudio observacional en una cohorte retrospectiva de 3.423 pacientes oncohematológicos a los cuales se les indicó un PICC ambulatoriamente durante 2012-2021. Variables: modelo de atención, motivo de la indicación, método de comprobación de la colocación del acceso, complicaciones del acceso vascular. Recogida de información mediante datos primarios del registro de acceso vascular y registro clínico de la historia informatizada ESPOQ2©. Análisis descriptivo paquete estadístico IBM SPSS® V.23.0 . Resultados: la creación de un equipo referente de terapia infusional incrementó la capacidad de colocación de catéteres, pasando de 98 (2013) a 768 (2021). La indicación del PICC pasó del 45,80% por instauración de quimioterapia mediante bomba de infusión domiciliaria (2016) al 93,70% por indicación por fármaco irritante o vesicante (2021) (p< 0,001). La introducción de la técnica ecoguiada y método electro-intracavitario de control de punta disminuyeron las complicaciones por flebitis mecánicas y la radiación por comprobación de catéter (p< 0,001). Conclusiones: los modelos de atención con equipos de terapia infusional referentes consolidados incrementan la seguridad del paciente oncológico portador de acceso vascular PICC.(AU)

Objective: to describe the evolution of the vascular access care model led by a nurse infusion therapy (ETI) team and its safety results associated with peripherally inserted central vascular access (PICC) in oncohematology patients. Methods: descriptive observational study in a retrospective cohort in 3,423 oncohaematological patients who were indicated for a PICC on an outpatient basis during 2012 to 2021. Variables: Care model, reason for the indication, access placement verification method, vascular access complications. Data collection using primary data from the vascular access registry and clinical registry of the ESPOQ2© computerized history. Descriptive analysis using IBM® SPSS® Statistics V.23.0. Results: infusional teams' reference increased the capacity to place catheters, going from 98 (2013) to 768 (2021). The indication for the PICC went from 45.80% due to initiation of chemotherapy home infusion (2016) to 93.70% due to an indication for an irritant or vesicant drug (2021) (p< 0.001). The introduction of the ultrasound-guided technique and electro-intracavitary method of tip control decreased complications due to mechanical phlebitis and radiation due to catheter verification (p< 0.001). Conclusions: care models with consolidated reference infusion therapy teams increase the safety of cancer patients with PICC vascular access.(AU)

Participatory action research intervention for improving sleep in inpatients with cancer.

AIM: To design and implement a plan to improve oncohaematological patients' sleep. BACKGROUND: The hospital environment can compromise inpatients' sleep, negatively impacting on health outcomes and patient satisfaction. DESIGN AND METHOD: The improvement plan was designed in collaboration with 18 professionals, 3 patients and 3 accompanying relatives. The study designed followed the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines. Outcome variables were self-reported patient satisfaction regarding sleep, measured using a 30-item, ad hoc questionnaire and a 10-point visual analogue scale, completed by 318 oncohaematological inpatients (pre-intervention n = 120, post-intervention, n = 198) in a comprehensive cancer centre in Spain from 2017 to 2019. RESULTS: Overall, 61.5% (n = 190) of the inpatients reported sleep alterations, and 92.6% reported interruptions in their nightly sleep. Half slept less than 6 h/night, but 58.0% said they felt rested upon waking, despite the interruptions. These outcomes were similar before and after the intervention. The improvement plan identified four domains for work (professionals, care procedures, instruments/environment and patients/relatives), 10 areas for improvement and 35 actions for implementation. However, overall sleep worsened significantly, from 6.73 to 6.06 on the 10-point scale. The intervention significantly improved variables related to professionals' behaviour, including noise during the shift change, conversations at the control desk and the use of corridor lights. Sleep disturbances were mainly caused by pain/discomfort and infuser alarms, and collectively they decreased significantly after the intervention (p = .008). However, overall sleep worsened significantly, from 6.73 to 6.06 on the 10-point scale. CONCLUSIONS: Pain, clinical devices and noise made by professionals are the main causes of sleep disturbances. Involving professionals in decision-making to improve patients' sleep have a positive impact on noise levels. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study proposes new strategies for improving sleep by increasing staff awareness and changing attitudes towards patients' sleep. Nurses should be involved in addressing sleep disturbances during hospitalization.

Análisis de la variabilidad del resultado del cultivo para «Streptococcus agalactiae» entre la semana 35-37 de gestación y el ingreso en sala de partos / Analysis of the variability of the culture outcome for «Streptococcus agalactiae» between week 35-37 of gestation and admission to delivery

Objetivo: Analizar la variabilidad del resultado del cultivo para Streptococcus agalactiae entre la semana 35-37 de gestación y el ingreso en sala de partos, así como las posibles variables influyentes en este cambio. Metodología: Estudio observacional, descriptivo y transversal. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo e inferencial, uni y bivariante. Técnica de muestreo no probabilística accidental. Resultados: Participaron 304 mujeres gestantes (608 muestras). La prevalencia de S. agalactiae se situó en el 15,1 % (preingreso) y el 15,6 % (ingreso). El 7,2 % de las mujeres (22) presentaron variabilidad de resultado entre el primer y el segundo cultivos. El 4,2 % (8) positivizó y un 3 % (14) negativizó. El 22,9 % (29) de los casos positivos presentaron cepas resistentes a clindamicina.Un antecedente de cultivo positivo aumentó la probabilidad de positividad cuatro veces durante la gestación actual. Los principales factores que influyeron en el cambio del resultado del cultivo aumentando su probabilidad fueron: la etnia (6,155 veces), el primer cultivo positivo (15,203 veces), la presencia de infecciones de transmisión sexual (3,8 veces), la edad (x2 0,005) y el peso (x2 0,044) con resultados estadísticamente relevantes. (AU)

Purpose: To investigate the variability of the culture result for Streptococcus agalactiae between weeks 35-37 of gestation and admissions to the delivery room and the possible variables influencing this change. Material and methods: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study of a series of cases was conducted with 304 (608 cultures) pregnant women. An accidental non-probabilistic sampling technique was used. Results: The results’ variability occurred in 7.2% (22) of the sample, where 4% (9) changed from positive to negative, and 26% (14) changed from negative to positive. The prevalence of pregnant women with positive Streptococcus agalactiae was 50 positives in the first culture (15.6%) and 46 (15.1%) in a second time. 4.2% (8) were positive and 3% (14) were negative. 22.9% (29) of the positive cases presented strains resistant to clindamycin.Presenting a history of positive culture in another pregnancy increased the probability of positivity four times during the current pregnancy. Likewise, obtaining a positive result in the first culture registered the probability of continuing to be positive in subsequent determinations in 9.5 times. The presence of a history of sexually transmitted infections increased the probability of suffering a change in result by 3.8 times. (AU)

Evidence on port-locking with heparin versus saline in patients with cancer not receiving chemotherapy: A randomized clinical trial.

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of port-locking with heparin every 2 months vs. every 4 months and vs. saline solution every 2 months in patients with cancer not receiving active chemotherapy. The hypothesis stated that locking with heparin at four-month intervals and saline at two-month intervals would not increment > 10% of port obstructions. Methods: Multicentre, phase IV parallel, post-test control group study took place at the two chemotherapy units of oncology hospitals. Included patients with cancer with ports that completed the chemotherapy treatment but still having port maintenance care or blood samples taken up to four months. A sample of 126 patients with cancer in three arms was needed to detect a maximum difference of 10% for bioequivalence on the locking methods. Consecutive cases non-probabilistic sampling and randomized to one of the three groups; group A: received heparin 60 IU/mL every two months (control) vs. group B heparin every four months and vs. saline every two months in group C. Primary variables were the type of locking regimen, port obstruction, and absence of blood return, port-related infection, or venous thrombosis during the study period. Clinical and sociodemographic variables were also collected. Results: A total of 143 patients were randomly assigned; group A, 47 patients with heparin every 2 months, group B, 51 patients with heparin 4 months, and group C, 45 patients with saline every 2 months. All participants presented an adequate blood return and no obstructions, until the month of the 10th, when one participant in the group A receiving was withdrawn due to an absence of blood flow (P â€‹= â€‹0.587). Conclusions: Port locks with heparin every 4 months or saline every 2 months did not show differences in safety maintenance, infection, or thrombosis compared to heparin every 2 months.

Infecciones de transmisión sexual e influencia en la positividad y/o modificación del resultado del cultivo para Streptococcus agalactiae durante la gestación / Sexually transmitted infections and influence on positivity and/or modification of culture results for Streptococcus agalactiae during gestation

Objetivo: Analizar la relación entre las infecciones de transmisión sexual (ITS) y la positividad para Streptococcus agalactiae (SGB) y/o la modificación del resultado del cultivo para SGB durante el tercer trimestre de gestación. Metodología: Estudio observacional, descriptivo y transversal de serie de casos en gestantes durante el periodo 2016-2018. Muestreo no probabilístico, accidental consecutivo, con un análisis descriptivo e inferencial y una recogida de datos ambispectiva. Resultados: La muestra del estudio fue de 304 gestantes (608 cultivos). La prevalencia de SGB en gestantes fue de 48 (15,3%). Existió una variabilidad de resultados entre los cultivos de 22 (7,2%). Un total de 25 gestantes (8,2%) presentaron antecedentes de ITS, lo que multiplicó el riesgo en 3,8 veces (p= 0,01) para la modificación y/o positividad del cultivo. No se halló asociación entre el tipo de ITS y el cultivo positivo para SGB y/o modificación de éste. Conclusiones: El estudio actualiza la prevalencia de SGB en nuestro medio en el 15,1-15,6%, y muestra una variabilidad del resultado del cultivo para SGB durante el tercer trimestre de gestación del 7,2%.El antecedente de ITS se asoció con una mayor probabilidad de modificación del cultivo para SGB (p= 0,01), así como de positividad del cultivo para SGB (p= 0,01) durante el tercer trimestre de gestación.Se debería considerar el antecedente de ITS, dada su influencia en el resultado final y/o positividad del cultivo rectovaginal. Se precisarían estudios de mayor amplitud y prospectivos para optimizar el cribado para SGB durante la gestación. (AU)

Objective: To analyze the relationship between sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and positivity for Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) and/or the modification of the culture result during third trimester of pregnancy.Methodology: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study of a series of cases in pregnancy women during the years 2016-2018. Non probabilistic, accidental and consecutive sampling with a descriptive and inferential analysis.Results: The study sample was 304 pregnant women (608 cultures). The prevalence of GBS was 48 (15.3%). There was a variability of results between the cultures of 22 (7.2%). 25(8.2%) of the pregnant women had a history of STIs, multiplying the risk by 3.8 times (p= 0.01) for the modification and/or positivity of the culture. There was no association between the type of STIs and the positive culture for GBS and/or its modification.Conclusions: The study updates the prevalence of GBS in our environment and shows a variability of between 15.1-15.6% and variability for the result of the culture during the third trimester of pregnancy of 7.2%.The history of STI was also associated with a greater probability of modification (p= 0.01) and positivity (p= 0.01) of the culture for GBS during the third trimester of gestation.A history of STI should be considered given its influence on the result and positivity of the vaginal-rectal culture. A larger study is required to optimize screening for GBS in pregnancy. (AU)

Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the "Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire" (W-DEQ-B).

The Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ-B) is an instrument that allows the experiences around fear of childbirth to be examined after the birth. It is currently the most widely used to measure different aspects related to the fear of childbirth and enables healthcare and additional assistance to women after birth to be adapted according to their needs. The objective of this study was to translate the W-DEQ-B into Spanish and analyse its reliability and validity. The study was carried out in two phases: (1) transcultural adaption of the questionnaire to Spanish and (2) a transversal study in a sample of 190 postpartum women from Sexual and Reproductive Health Clinics in the province of Barcelona (Spain). The psychometric properties were examined in terms of reliability (internal consistency and temporal stability) and construct validity (confirmatory factorial analysis [CFA] and exploratory factorial analysis [EFA]). The results of the CFA did not confirm unidimensionality of the W-DEQ-B questionnaire. The EFA suggested four very similar, but not identical, dimensions to those obtained in other studies in which the W-DEQ-B has been evaluated. Both the Cronbach's alpha and the omega coefficient were adequate for the total questionnaire and for each of the four dimensions. The results of this study confirm that the W-DEQ-B is multi-dimensional. In the Spanish version of the W-DEQ-B-Sp four dimensions have been identified that allow the experiences around fear of childbirth to be examined after the birth. The Spanish version of the WDEQ-B (WDEQ-B-Sp) is reliable and valid for the measurement of fear of childbirth in clinical practice and for use in future research.

Reliability and validity study of the Spanish adaptation of the "Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire" (W-DEQ-A).

The Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ-A) is an instrument that evaluates fear of childbirth through the expectations of women in relation to childbirth and their experience during the birth. The objective of this study was to translate the W-DEQ-A into Spanish and analyse its reliability and validity. The study was carried out in two phases: (1) adapting the questionnaire to Spanish and (2) a transversal study in a sample of 273 pregnant women in the Sexual and Reproductive Health centres in the Metropolitan Northern Barcelona in Catalonia (Spain). The psychometric properties were analysed in terms of reliability and construct validity. The confirmatory factorial analysis did not confirm the unidimensionality of the original structure of the WDEQ-A, as happened with the other studies in which it has previously been validated. The result of the exploratory factorial analysis suggests four factors, or dimensions, very similar but not identical to those obtained in other analysis studies of the W-DEQ-A. The Cronbach alpha and the omega scale were also adequate for all the scales and for each of the dimensions. The results of this study confirm the findings of other studies that suggest that the W-DEQ-A is multi-dimensional. In the Spanish version of the W-DEQ-A four dimensions have been identified to explore fear of childbirth in pregnant women. The Spanish version of the WDEQ-A (WDEQ-A-Sp) is reliable and valid for the measurement of fear of childbirth in clinical practice and for use in future research.

Factors associated with receipt of the 5As model of brief intervention for smoking cessation among hospitalized patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Guidelines recommend the 5As model of brief intervention for providing smoking cessation support in clinical settings. This study assessed patient and hospital characteristics associated with self-reported receipt of the 5As (ask, advise, assess, assist and arrange). DESIGN: Multi-center cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Adult inpatients (n = 1047) were randomly selected from 13 hospitals in the Barcelona province of Spain in 2014-2015. MEASUREMENTS: We explored participants' receipt of the 5As through a questionnaire. Given the progressiveness of the 5As, we recoded the fulfillment of the intervention as: A0 : no intervention; A1 : ask; A2 : ask and advise; A3 : A2 and assess; A4 : A3 and assist; and A5 : A4 and arrange a follow-up. We explored patient (e.g. age, sex, comorbidities) and hospital (e.g. type of hospital, unit) characteristics. We adjusted multi-level robust Poisson regression models to estimate the adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) of the association between the recoded 5As intervention received. FINDINGS: A total of 60.4% (n = 624) of patients had been asked (A1 ) about their smoking status. Among smokers, 46.5% (n = 90) were advised (A2 ), 26.6% (n = 48) assessed (A3 ) and 4.6% (n = 10) received all the components of the 5As (A5 ). Middle-aged smokers [aPR = 3.63; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.69-7.79] with a respiratory disease (aPR = 2.19; 95% CI = 1.11-4.34) were most likely to have been asked, advised and assessed (A3 ). The cessation intervention was most frequently performed by physicians. CONCLUSIONS: In the Barcelona province of Spain, it appears that fewer than half of hospitalized patients who smoke were advised to quit and few received the full 'five As' brief intervention for smoking cessation.

E-Learning course for nurses on pain assessment in patients unable to self-report.

Public hospitals in Catalonia, Spain, have recommended assessing pain in non-communicative inpatients by means of the Spanish version of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia scale (PAINAD-Sp) since 2010; a modification for patients with neurologic disorders and cancer, PAINAD-Sp_Hosp, has also been validated. However, nurses are not routinely trained in the use of the scales. The aim of this study was to assess knowledge on pain assessment in nurses following an online training course. We surveyed participants prior to the course to determine baseline knowledge of pain and pain assessment. Course material included conceptual content on pain and practical videos demonstrating the scoring system for the PAINAD-Sp_Hosp scale. After completing the course, participants took a multiple choice quiz to test understanding of course content and a satisfaction survey to determine acceptability. Of the 836 nurses invited, 401 participated in the training course; 37.7% reported having no previous specific training on pain, and just 32.2% used the PAINAD-Sp scale regularly. Following the course, virtually all (99%) of the participants passed the quiz. Overall satisfaction among nurses with regard to the training received was 8.6/10. Thus, the e-learning course was effective and acceptable for training nurses on pain assessment using validated tools.

Patient perceptions of tobacco control after smoke-free hospital grounds legislation: Multi-center cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patient perceptions of the role of health care providers in tobacco control and tobacco-related services they should provide after the introduction of national smoke-free hospital grounds legislation in Spain. DESIGN: Multi-center cross-sectional study. SETTING: Thirteen hospitals in Barcelona province in 2014-2015. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,047 adult hospital patients, with a stay ≥ 24 h were randomly selected. METHOD: We explored participants' perceptions of the role of health professionals and hospitals in tobacco control by asking about their agreement with several statements after the introduction of national legislation on smoke-free hospital grounds: (i) health professionals "should set an example and not smoke" and "should provide smoking cessation support"; (ii) hospitals "should provide smoking cessation treatments" and are "role model organizations in compliance with the smoke-free legislation", and (iii) "hospitalization is a perfect moment to quit smoking". Responses were described overall and according to participant and hospital characteristics: patient sex and age, type of hospital unit, number of beds, and smoking prevalence among hospital staff. RESULTS: The majority of participants considered that health professionals should be role models in tobacco cessation (75.3%), should provide smoking cessation support to patients (83.0%), and that hospitalization is a good opportunity for initiating an attempt to quit (71.5%). Inpatients admitted to general hospitals where smoking cessation was not given as part of their portfolio, with a low level of implementation in tobacco control, and who stayed in surgical units had higher expectations of receiving smoking cessation interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatients strongly support the role of hospitals and health professionals in tobacco control and expect to receive smoking cessation interventions during their hospital stay. Systematically providing smoking cessation services in hospitals may have a relevant impact on health outcomes among smokers and on health care system expenditures.

Impact of a Training Intervention on the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) Scale in Noncommunicative Inpatients.

BACKGROUND: Public hospitals in Catalonia (Spain) recommend using the Spanish version of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD-Sp) scale for assessing pain in adult patients unable to self-report. However, since its inclusion in Catalonian nursing care plans in 2010, there have been no training programs for nurses, contributing to its current underuse. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a nurse training intervention on the PAINAD-Sp scale in noncommunicative inpatients unable to self-report. DESIGN: Before-after study. SETTINGS: Two public hospitals in Catalonia (Spain). PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS: Four hundred and one nurses participated in the training course and 219 patients received PAINAD-Sp assessments. METHODS: We used a before-after study design, evaluating the use of the PAINAD-Sp scale over two 6-month periods before and after an online training intervention for nurses in February 2017, in two public hospitals. Data were collected from patient records in each center. The primary outcome was the number of patients receiving PAINAD-Sp assessments during admission. Secondary outcomes were the number of assessments undertaken per patient during admission, the total (0-10) and item-specific (0-2) PAINAD-Sp score, and pharmacologic treatment administered. RESULTS: There were 401 nurses who took part in the training program. Over the study period, 219 patients received PAINAD-Sp assessments: 29 in the preintervention period and 190 in the postintervention period (p < .001). Administration of analgesics and antipyretics decreased (p < .001) after the intervention, whereas use of hypnotic drugs and sedatives increased. CONCLUSIONS: Theoretical and practical training may be an effective way to improve nurses' approach to identifying, assessing, and managing pain in patients unable to self-report.

Aplicación de hipotermia en extremidades en la prevención de la eritrodisestesia palmo-plantar secundaria a administración de doxorrubicina liposomal pegilada / Applying hypothermia in extremities for the prevention of palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia secondary to the administration of pegylated liposomal doxor

La eritrodisestesia palmo-plantar o síndrome mano-pie es un efecto secundario de algunos tipos de quimioterapia. Se trata de una toxicidad cutánea que no pone en peligro la vida del paciente, pero sí que es dosis limitante y altera la calidad de vida. Se manifiesta en forma de eritema doloroso, a menudo precedido de parestesias en palmas de las manos y plantas de los pies, generando enrojecimiento, hinchazón y dolor, e incluso presencia de flictenas. Para su prevención y control existen medidas farmacológicas, pero también se utiliza la aplicación de crioterapia. Los cuidados de Enfermería son de gran importancia en el manejo de los síntomas, durante el tratamiento y el alivio de los efectos secundarios. El objetivo de este artículo es dar a conocer la eritrodisestesia palmo-plantar, así como aportar la experiencia clínica relacionada con la utilización de crioterapia preventiva mediante un caso clínico

Palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia or hand-foot syndrome is a side effect of some types of chemotherapy. This is skin toxicity not life-threatening for patients, but dose-limiting and with impact on Quality of Life. It appears as a painful erythema, often preceded by paresthesia in hand palms and feet soles, generating reddening, swelling and pain, and even the presence of phlyctenae. There are pharmacological measures for its prevention and control, but the application of cryotherapy can also be used. Nursing care is very important for symptom management, during treatment and relief of side effects. The objective of this article is to create awareness about palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia, as well as to offer the clinical experience associated with the use of preventive cryotherapy through a case report

Validation of the Spanish Version of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale (PAINAD-Sp) in Hospitalized Patients with Neurologic Disorders and Oncologic Patients Unable to Self-Report Their Pain.

BACKGROUND: Pain has a significant impact on hospitalized patients and is a quality indicator for nursing care. The Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale measures pain in people with communication disorders and advanced dementia, but it has not been validated in any other population. AIMS: The aim of this study was to validate the Spanish version (PAINAD-Sp) in hospitalized patients with neurologic disorders and in end-of-life cancer patients with difficulty self-reporting. DESIGN: The study had two phases: (1) analysis of the content by a committee of experts and (2) a cross-sectional study. SETTINGS: We collected phase 2 data from January 2017 to December 2017 in four hospitals in Barcelona: Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, and Hospital de Bellvitge. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS: We included all adults who had either a neurological disorder affecting language or an oncological disease with an end-of-life prognosis and difficulty self-reporting pain. We excluded patients with a diagnosis of dementia. METHODS: The cross-sectional study included 325 patients who were simultaneously evaluated by two observers both at rest and in movement. We analyzed psychometric properties in terms of construct validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change. RESULTS: We obtained Cronbach α > .70 in both situations and an inter-rater reliability of 0.80. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the model adjusted adequately to a unidimensional structure. In terms of sensitivity to change, the mean difference was greater in movement than at rest (difference in means was 1.15). CONCLUSIONS: The PAINAD-Sp_Hosp scale had good psychometric qualities in terms of validity and reliability in neurology and oncology patients unable to self-report pain.

Miedo al parto: revisión bibliográfica de los instrumentos de medida / Fear of childbirth: literature review of measuring instruments

Objetivo: Analizar los instrumentos de evaluación del miedo al parto y sus características de validez. Metodología: Revisión bibliográfica en CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus y Cuiden de los estudios publicados entre 1982 y 2018, mediante combinaciones booleanas de palabras clave, que exploraran el miedo al parto mediante instrumentos validados o instrumentos con propiedades psicométricas de validez. Resultados: Se seleccionó un total de 12 artículos originales que presentan instrumentos de medición del miedo. Dos escalas evaluaban el miedo al parto antes del embarazo, mientras que las 10 restantes evaluaban el miedo durante el embarazo y/o el parto y tras el mismo. Todas las escalas muestran una buena fiabilidad con valores alfa de Cronbach >0,70. Conclusiones: La presente revisión ha permitido identificar 12 instrumentos que se han desarrollado con el fin de medir el miedo al parto. Presentan buenas propiedades psicométricas y han demostrado ser válidos en diferentes muestras culturales

Objective: Analyze the evaluation instruments of fear of childbirth and its validity characteristics. Methods: Bibliographic review in CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and Cuiden of the studies published between 1982 and 2018, using Boolean combinations of keywords, which explore fear of childbirth through validated instruments or instruments with valid psychometric properties. Results: A total of 12 original articles were selected that present fear measuring instruments. Two scales assess the fear of childbirth before pregnancy while the other ten evaluate fear during pregnancy and/or delivery and after it. All scales show good reliability with Cronbach alpha values >0.70. Conclusions: The results of this review contribute to identify the instruments that have been developed in order to measure the fear of childbirth

Efficacy of Plantago major, chlorhexidine 0.12% and sodium bicarbonate 5% solution in the treatment of oral mucositis in cancer patients with solid tumour: A feasibility randomised triple-blind phase III clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Oral mucositis is one of the most common adverse effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of Plantago major extract versus chlorhexidine 0.12% versus sodium bicarbonate 5% in the symptomatic treatment of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in solid tumour cancer patients. METHOD: Multicentre randomised controlled trial estimated sample of 45 solid tumour patients with grade II-III mucositis. The participants were randomised to one of three treatments, consisting of sodium bicarbonate 5% aqueous solution together with: an additional dose of sodium bicarbonate 5% aqueous solution, Plantago major extract, or chlorhexidine 0.12%. The primary outcomes were severity of mucositis, pain intensity, oral intake capacity and quality of life. The independent variable was treatment group, and confounders included sociodemographic data, neutrophil count, chemotherapy drug and dose received. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients enrolled, 68% (n = 34) achieved grade 0 mucositis (none), with those using the double sodium bicarbonate rinse healing in five days on average (95% CI 3.9, 6.5) versus seven days (95% CI 5.3, 9,0) for the chlorhexidine group and seven days (95% CI 5.3, 8.5) for the Plantago major group. The pain experienced by the participants lessened over the 14 days of treatment, but differences in pain intensity between the three groups did not show statistical significance (p = 0.762). CONCLUSIONS: Healing time was shorter with the double sodium bicarbonate solution compared to the other two rinses, but the differences were not significant. Our results suggest it may be time to reconsider the use of Plantago major extract in the management of oral mucositis.

Eficacia de la educación sanitaria a pacientes y familiares en la Unidad de Monitorización de Epilepsia / Efficacy of healthcare education for patients and relatives in the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit

Objetivo: evaluar la efectividad, en el conocimiento y manejo de la epilepsia, de una intervención educativa personalizada sistematizada (IEPS) versus atención convencional, en pacientes ingresados con epilepsia fármaco resistente y sus familiares, durante su estancia en la Unidad de Monitorización de Epilepsia del Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol (Barcelona). Método: ensayo controlado y aleatorizado. Muestra de 20 pacientes y 20 familiares. Se realiza una IEPS al grupo experimental por enfermeras especializadas dirigida a pacientes epilépticos ingresados en la unidad acompañados de un familiar (el grupo control recibió atención habitual). Variable dependiente: conocimientos y manejo de la epilepsia tras la intervención educativa, a los seis meses y al año, con instrumentos ad hoc (puntuación 0 a 36). Se utilizaron las pruebas de contraste de hipótesis t de Student, U de Mann-Whitney, prueba de Wilcoxon, y test de Friedman. Resultados: muestra final de 42 participantes (21 pacientes y 21 familiares). En el caso de los pacientes, el impacto de la intervención educativa fue estadísticamente significativo a favor del grupo experimental frente al grupo experimental frente al grupo control al alta (p= <0,001) y a los seis meses (p= 0,003), pero no a los 12 meses (p= 0,111). En el grupo de familiares solo se encuentran diferencias estadísticamente significativas al alta (p=0,016), no a los seis meses (p= 0,593), ni a los 12 meses (p= 0,104). Conclusiones: la intervención educativa incide en el grado de conocimientos frente al manejo de la epilepsia del paciente y familiar. Los resultados obtenidos alientan a seguir con la implantación del programa educativo y realizar la educación para la salud en la unidad de monitorización de epilepsia (AU)

Objective: to evaluate the efficacy in terms of knowledge and management of epilepsy of a systematic personalized educational intervention (SPEI) vs. conventional care, in patients hospitalized with drug-resistant epilepsy and their relatives, during their stay at the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit in the Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol (Barcelona). Method: a controlled and randomised clinical trial, with a sample of 20 patients and 20 relatives. A SPEI was conducted on the experimental group by specialized nurses, targeted to epileptic patients hospitalized in the unit and accompanied by a relative (the control arm received the usual care). Dependent variable: knowledge and management of epilepsy after the educational intervention, at six months and at one year, with ad hoc tools (score 0 to 36). The hypothesis contrast tests used were: Student’s t, Mann-Whitney’s, Wilcoxon test, and Friedman test. Results: a final sample of 42 participants (21 patients and 21 relatives). In the case of patients, the impact of educational intervention was statiscally significant in favour of the experimental arm vs. the control arm at discharge (p= <0.001) and at six months (p= 0.003), but not at 12 months (p= 0.111). In the relatives arm, statistically significant differences were only found at discharge (p= 0.016), but not at six months (p= 0.593), or at 12 months (p= 0.104). Conclusions: the educational intervention has an impact on the level of knowledge regarding epilepsy management by patients and relatives. The outcomes obtained are encouraging to continue the implementation of the educational program, and to conduct health education in the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (AU)

The Oncology Nurse Prescribing: A Catalonian Survey.

OBJECTIVE: This study identifies the capability, knowledge, and satisfaction of oncology nurses in Spain after approval of the nurse prescribing law in 2006. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 140 nurses in three cancer centers in Catalonia, Spain, by using convenience sampling method. The principal variables of this study were nurse satisfaction, knowledge about what products nurses are allowed to prescribe, the nurses' perception of their own prescribing ability, and their opinion on education and training needs with regard to the new approved law. The secondary variables included years of professional experience, place of work, and sociodemographic variables. Data were collected during a 3 months period by using a piloted 29-item self-assessment questionnaire. RESULTS: Analyses of univariate and bivariate data showed that 82.2% of the nurses were aware of the approved law, but 94.2% indicated that they lack information about it. The mean satisfaction with the approval of the law was 6.64 ± 1.76 (numerical scale 0-10). In addition, 68.1% and 55.1% of the nurses were prepared to prescribe medical devices and drugs, respectively. To date, 61.1% of the nurses prescribe medical devices and 66% prescribe pharmacological products daily. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses expressed general satisfaction with the approval of the Law 29/2006. Nurses currently provide prescriptions, but widespread knowledge of the allowed prescriptions is lacking.

Analysis of University Postgraduate Nursing Education in Spain.

BACKGROUND: The nursing education program framework in Spain has recently been adapted and modified. This study aimed to analyze university postgraduate master'slevel nursing education during the past 21 years in Spain in terms of educational supply and demand. METHOD: A retrospective, longitudinal, descriptive, and observational design was used. The educational offerings at 15 university nursing schools in Spain were examined. The target population was 7,871 registered and licensed nurses who had completed postgraduate education. RESULTS: Among the 211 programs offered, public universities' educational offerings focused on two areas-public health and emergency care-whereas most courses in private universities were in surgery. Regarding demand, 1,235 nurses were enrolled. The most frequently requested educational areas were surgery, emergency and urgent care, and public health. CONCLUSION: Although the postgraduate nursing education situation has changed, supply and demand for this type of education in Spain are well balanced at both public and private universities. [J Nurs Educ. 2016;55(11):615-622.].

Cérvix rígido en fase de dilatación: prevalencia e influencia en la evolución del proceso de parto / Cervical rigidity during dilatation phase: prevalence and influence on the evolution of the labour process

OBJETIVO: Conocer la prevalencia de cérvix rígido y su asociación con el proceso del parto y los antecedentes obstétricos en gestantes atendidas en el Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol de Badalona (Barcelona).MÉTODO: Estudio observacional, transversal, retrospectivo, sobre una población diana de 1.500 gestantes anuales. Muestreo no probabilístico de caso consecutivo. Muestra de 232 gestantes para un intervalo de confianza del 95%, una prevalencia del 50% y una precisión del 5%.Las variables principales fueron: presencia de cérvix rígido, tiempo total de parto, tipo de parto, y características sociodemográficas y de salud de la mujer y el neonato. Datos recogidos entre septiembre y diciembre de 2012 mediante revisión de los registros de partos. RESULTADOS: Participaron 219 mujeres con una media de semanas de gestación de 39,5 ± 1,6. El 51,6% (n= 112) de las mujeres eran nulíparas y el31,5% (n= 69), primíparas. La incidencia de inducción al parto se situó en el 22,1% (n= 46). El 66,2% (n= 145) de los partos fueron eutócicos y el20% (n= 44) instrumentados. La presencia de rigidez de cérvix fue del19,2% (n= 42). Se encontró asociación entre la presencia de rigidez y la inducción al parto (p= 0,006), así como entre la presencia de rigidez y el tiempo de parto (5,6 frente a 7,7 h; p= 0,005) y entre la presencia de rigidez y la nuliparidad (p= 0,006). No se encontraron asociaciones entre rigidez de cérvix y finalización del parto ni con los antecedentes de cesárea. CONCLUSIONES: Casi una quinta parte de los partos presentaron rigidez de cérvix. La existencia de cérvix rígido está asociada a parto inducido, mayor duración del tiempo de trabajo de parto y nuliparidad

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of the cervical rigidity among pregnant women in labour and the most frequent associated factors in a high technology hospital in Barcelona (Spain).METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive, transversal study was carried out among 1,500 women in labour assisted at Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol (Spain) in 2012. Cases were enrolled by using non probabilistic consecutive sampling technique. We estimated a sample size of 232 women in labour with 95% CI (confidence interval) for an expected prevalence of 50% and a maximum difference of 5%. Inclusion criteria were: type of labour assistance procedure in the delivery ward, and complete record of the studied variables, including: presence of cervical rigidity, overall time of laboring, type of birth, inducted or spontaneous labour, previous cesarean, and other sociodemographic data. Data was retrieved from the clinical records. RESULTS: 219 women in labour met the inclusion criteria. Sample characteristics were: 39.5 ± 1.6 pregnancy weeks; 51.6% (n= 112) nulliparous, 31.5%(n= 69) primiparous; 22.1% (n= 46) labour induction; by type of birth: 66.2%(n= 145) of eutocic and 20% (n= 44) of instrumented. We found a19.2% (n= 42) of cervical rigidity; a 14.3% (n= 31) from total rigidities were found among nulliparous (p= 0.006). An association between cervical rigidity and labour induction was found (p= 0.004), as well as between cervical rigidity and labour duration (5.6 vs. 7.7 h; p= 0.005). No association was found between cervical rigidity and type of birth or previous cesarean. CONCLUSIONS: Induction causes might be reviewed because they are frequent, implying higher cervical rigidity and longer deliveries

Ensayo clínico aleatorizado sobre el control del dolor en las fracturas pertrocantéreas de fémur mediante el uso o no de tracción cutánea / Randomised clinical trial on pain control in intertrochanteric fractures of the femur with and without skin traction

Objetivo. Evaluar el grado de control del dolor de los pacientes afectos de fracturas pertrocantéreas de fémur en función de la aplicación o no de tracción cutánea. Método. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado unicéntrico, paralelo, controlado y abierto realizado en el ámbito hospitalario. Los sujetos a estudio fueron pacientes que acudieron al servicio de urgencias por fractura pertrocantérea de fémur. Muestra de 40 pacientes (potencia 80% IC: 95%). Muestreo no probabilístico consecutivo. Pacientes asignados de manera aleatoria (1:1) a tratamiento con tracción cutánea o sin tracción. La asignación fue realizada mediante sobres cerrados. La variable principal de estudio fue la evaluación del dolor a las 48 horas de ingreso. La recogida de datos se realizó durante febrero a octubre de 2008 mediante cuaderno de registro de datos ad hoc, siendo evaluadas basalmente, a las 2h, 24h y 48h del ingreso del paciente. Resultados. A la 48 horas del ingreso el dolor basal medio de la muestra mejoró en 4,4 puntos (DE: 1,8) (p<0,001), el efecto diferencial del nivel de dolor entre los dos grupos de estudio fue de 0,7 puntos de la escala EVA (IC: 95% -0,7 a 0,6), el efecto de la tracción no demostró diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p=0,721). Fue retirado un paciente por reacción cutánea al adhesivo de la tracción. Conclusiones. El tratamiento con tracción cutánea en los pacientes con fractura pertrocantérea de fémur no produce cambios en la evolución del dolor en comparación con los pacientes sin tracción cutánea (AU)

Aim. To evaluate the level of pain control among patients with intertrochanteric fracture of the femur with and without the application of skin traction. Methods. A randomised, single centre, parallel, controlled and open, clinical trial performed in a hospital environment. The study subjects were patients with an intertrochanteric femur fracture seen in the Emergency Department. A non-probabilistic and consecutive sample of 40 patients (power 80% CI: 95%), was used. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with or without skin traction. The assignment was made by means of sealed envelopes. The principal variable of study was the evaluation of the pain at 48 hours after admission. Data was collected during February to October 2008 using an ad hoc questionnaire. Data was collected at baseline, 2h, 24h and 48h after admission. Results. At 48hours after admission, the mean baseline pain improved by 4.4 points (SD: 1.8) (P<.001), the differential effect of the level of pain between both study groups was 0.7 points of the VAS scale (95% CI, -0.7 to 0.6), while the effect of traction showed no statistically significant differences (P=.721). One patient was withdrawn due skin reaction to the traction adhesive. Conclusions. The treatment with skin traction in the patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur does not produce changes in the progression of the pain in comparison with the patients without skin traction (AU)